All papers that comply with the submission guidelines will be peer-reviewed and assessed based on originality, technical and/or research content/depth, the topic of interest, conference relevance, contributions, and readability. Acceptance of articles will be informed to authors via email. The authors of accepted articles will be able to make changes based on the reviewer’s suggestion and submit final camera-ready manuscripts by the required deadline. 

  • Each manuscript submitted will be independently reviewed by at least one reviewer with expertise in the relevant subject area in a double-blind peer-review process.
  • Submitted manuscript will be evaluated based on full paper, including Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Result, Discussion, Conclusion, as well as appropriate references.
  • The decision for acceptance, amendment, or rejection is based upon the reviewer’s comments/recommendations and made by the Editor.
  • Authors are suggested to address all reviewer’s reports and improved the revised paper.
  • Manuscripts sent back to the authors for revision should be returned to the Conference’s submission system within two weeks of email notification.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.